Introduction

The goal of this project has been to identify the most significant heritage resources within the boundaries of the District of Maple Ridge. This project adds to the scope of several previous inventories that date back over almost twenty years, expanding on their scope, and adding newly identified resources. The inventory methodology involved a number of sequential steps.

Identification of Potential Sites

There were several available inventory lists, including field work undertaken in the 1970s for the Canadian Inventory of Historic Buildings, the Port Haney Heritage Inventory, 1986, and the Maple Ridge Inventory List, 1991. All previously identified sites were consolidated, and any other resources that were identified through research or suggested by the Heritage Advisory Committee were added to this list. A public nomination was undertaken, whereby the community at large was invited to submit addresses and information for consideration. This process resulted in several hundred sites being listed.

Broadly-Based Historical Research

Existing historical information was surveyed for relevant data regarding settlement patterns and background on specific persons and buildings. The publication "Maple Ridge: A History of Settlement" was the most useful source. Other pertinent research sources were also identified at this point. The general history of the area was traced, and major transportation routes identified.

Field Survey

All of the identified sites were surveyed; to ensure that significant resources had not been missed, early transportation routes in all the areas were examined. Many of the previously- identified resources were found to be altered or demolished. Those resources chosen for further study were photographed, and an inventory form was filled out that gave a physical, structural and contextual description, and a visual survey of condition and integrity.

Focussed Research

The resources identified in the field survey were then more fully researched, to identify their historical importance to the community. Municipal and archival records were examined, that allowed for consistent and accurate identification. The most useful records were those held in the collection of the Maple Ridge Museum, and the archival records held by the District of Maple Ridge, especially the Tax Assessment Rolls, which date back to 1875. Other research sources that were consulted included relevant B.C. Directories from 1882, the previous research conducted for the Canadian Inventory of Historic Buildings, historic photographs and maps located in the Provincial Archives of B.C., the Vancouver Public Library Historical Photographs Division, and the City of Vancouver Archives. All of the information from these listed sources was then combined to provide the historic background for each listed building.

Much additional historical information of general interest was also unearthed during this process, and many sites were rechecked. A comprehensive picture of the District's heritage of Port Haney was thus amassed. The completed inventory forms were then assembled as an inventory master book for further reference purposes.

Final Evaluation

The inventoried structures were then assessed as to their overall relative importance to the area. Issues of architectural, historical and contextual merit were assessed for each site. A final evaluation was then undertaken, based on established evaluation criteria. Through this process 95 historic buildings were identified; in addition, 5 historic cemeteries, 14 landscape features and three historic objects were also identified.

Construction dates given in this inventory are considered known if they are accurate to within one year; other dates are listed as circa. Names given to buildings are generally the earliest one that can be determined, or in the case of most residences, the name of the first owner. It is hoped that the owners of these buildings will find this historical information to be a source of pride, and help them in the process of the preservation and restoration of these important structures. We wish everyone concerned the best of luck in the future stages that will follow this inventory.

Throughout this project, respect was shown for the rights of individual property owners. Anyone wishing to view these buildings should be conscious of each owner's privacy, and should not cross the bounds of private property.

Evaluation Criteria

The historic resources included as part of this report have been consistently evaluated according to the following criteria:

ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY

  1. STYLE/TYPE: a building's style representative of the District's significant development periods; or a building type associated with a significant industrial, institutional, commercial or transportation activity.

    Excellent
    An excellent example of a style or type, or
    One of few surviving and very good examples of a style or type, or
    One of the earliest, very good examples of a style or type
    Very Good
    A very good example of a style or type, or
    A good example of a style or type that is notably early or rare.
    Good
    A good example of a style or type that is common.
    Fair/Poor
    An average example of a style or type that remains common.
  2. DESIGN: A building's notable or special attributes of an aesthetic or functional nature. These may include massing, proportion, materials, detail, fenestration, ornamentation, artwork, or functional layout.

    Excellent
    A design that is outstanding in comparison with other examples.
    Very Good
    A design which is equal to several others of recognizable superior or special quality.
    Good
    A design which incorporates several special or aesthetic features.
    Fair/Poor
    A design of no special significance or quality beyond stylistic considerations.
  3. CONSTRUCTION: A building's unique or uncommon building materials, or its historically early or innovative method of construction.

    Excellent
    One of the earliest known uses of an important or special material or method, or
    A now rare and out-of-use material or method.
    Very Good
    One of the earliest known surviving uses of an important or special material or method, or
    A notable or out-of-use material or method of which several examples survive.
    Good
    An out-of-use material or method which is typical of a period and still commonly found.
    Fair/Poor
    An example of no particular significance, or
    An example of typical construction techniques.
  4. DESIGNER/BUILDER: A building's architect, designer, engineer and/or builder who has made a significant contribution to the District, province or nation.

    Excellent
    Those who were responsible for establishing or advancing a style, design or construction method that was significant and influential.
    Very Good
    Those whose works are of considerable importance to building and development.
    Good
    Those whose works are of some importance to building and development.
    Fair/Poor
    Of unknown or little significance.

CULTURAL HISTORY

  1. HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION:A building's direct association with a person, group, institution, event or activity that is of historical significance to the District, province or nation.

    Excellent
    Closely connected with a person, etc. of considerable importance.
    Very Good
    Closely connected with a person, etc of moderate importance.
    Good
    Closely connected with a person, etc. of some importance, or of moderate importance on a local area or neighbourhood level.
    Fair/Poor
    Minor historical association only, or unknown historical association.
  2. HISTORICAL PATTERN: A building's association with broad patterns of local area history, including development and settlement patterns, early or important transportation routes, ecological or geographic change, significant landforms, or social, political or economic trends. In urban settings, a buildings recognition of street pattern and infrastructure.

    Excellent
    A building that can be directly linked to the establishment of an historical pattern of District-wide importance.
    Very Good
    A building that can be directly linked to the establishment of an historical pattern of local area or neighbourhood importance, or
    A building that can be linked to the establishment of an historical pattern, and is one of the earliest surviving examples.
    Good
    A building that provides strong evidence of an historical pattern of some importance.
    Fair/Poor
    A building of no discernible association with a recognizable historical pattern, or
    An unknown association with a recognizable pattern.

CONTEXT

  1. LANDSCAPE/SITE: An intact historical landscape or landscape features associated with an existing building; or a notable historical relationship between a building's site and its immediate environment, including original native trees and topographical features; or a notable use of landscaping in conjunction with an existing building.

    Excellent
    A setting comprised of numerous, significant landscape features which are directly related to the building's style, design and history, or
    A notable and intact historical relationship between a building's site and the street, waterfront, view or other geographic leatures which were part of the building's original function or environment.
    Very Good
    A landscape which includes several dominant features which are directly related to the building's style, design, or history, or
    An altered, but still strongly apparent, historical relationship between the site and its immediate surroundings.
    Good
    A landscape which includes one or two important features which are directly related to the building's style, design, or history, or
    An altered, but still recognizable, historical relationship between the site and its immediate surroundings.
    Fair/Poor
    No significant and recognizable landscape features or building site relationship.
  2. NEIGHBOURHOOD: A building's continuity and compatibility with adjacent buildings and visual contribution to a group of similar buildings.

    Excellent
    A building that is an important part of a visually prominent and notable group of buildings of similar style, type or age, in an area of compatible use.
    Very Good
    A building which forms part of a contiguous group of similar style, type or age in an area of compatible use, or
    A building with other inventoried addresses adjacent
    Good
    A building which is part of a contiguous group of similar style, type or age in an area of incompatible use, or
    A building which is not part of a contiguous group of similar style, type or age but is in an area of compatible use.
    Fair/Poor
    A building which is not part of a group of buildings of similar style, type or age, and is in an area of incompatible use.
  3. VISUAL/SYMBOLIC IMPORTANCE:A building's importance as a landmark structure; or its symbolic value to the District or a local area or neighbourhood.

    Excellent
    A landmark building of District-wide importance, or
    A building of significant symbolic value to the District.
    Very Good
    A major visual landmark or a building of significant symbolic value to a local area or neighbourhood.
    Good
    A visual landmark or building of symbolic significance to its immediate surroundings.
    Fair/Poor
    A building of little or no landmark or symbolic significance, or
    A building which is not particularly prominent.

INTEGRITY

  1. A measure of the impact of changes to the building on the appreciation of its style, design, construction or character.

    Excellent
    A building with no detracting alterations, or
    Alterations of a minor nature only, or
    Alterations which may be considered minor.
    Very Good
    A building with one or more minor alterations, the effect of which is recognizable but does not significantly detract from the style, design, construction or character.
    Good
    A building with a major alteration and/or a combination of several minor alterations, the effect of which detracts from the style, design, construction or character.
    Fair
    A building with several major alterations, the effect of which detracts from the style, design, construction or character.
    Poor
    A building with major alterations which greatly detract from the style, design, construction or character.

Other types of historic resources have been evaluated with similar criteria, adjusted to fit each category.